AI EMPLOYEE
Industries
INDUSTRIES
Restaurants Cleaning Services Home Service Companies Dental & Orthodontics Fitness & Wellness Hospitality HVAC/Plumbing
Pricing
Partners
PARTNERS
Become a partner Partners Listing
Resources
DEVELOPERS
Agent Creator NEWO BUILDER API & DOCUMENTATION ACADEMY VIDEO TUTORIALS COMMUNITY HELP How to choose AI automation
COMPANY
ABOUT Competitive Advantage CONTACT BLOG INSIGHTS
Call 24/7: +1 (888) 639-6939 free consultations
Book a Demo
Home / Blog / The Battle Between AI-generated Images and Detection Tools: A Losing Game?
1 years ago 2 min read

The Battle Between AI-generated Images and Detection Tools: A Losing Game?

img

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to a surge in synthetic imagery that's becoming increasingly challenging to distinguish from reality. Such lifelike fabrications, like those of the Pope in designer gear or fabricated moon landings, are contributing to the muddying of our understanding of truth and fiction. To counter this, many new companies have emerged, offering sophisticated AI-detection tools that analyze the nuances of content to distinguish between human and AI-generated creations.

However, there is an ongoing debate about whether these detection tools can keep pace with rapidly advancing AI technology. In a recent experiment by The New York Times, the effectiveness of five new services was tested against over a hundred synthetic images and real photos. The findings revealed that while these detection services are evolving quickly, they still occasionally miss the mark.

Key points from the article include:

  • A synthetic image of Elon Musk embracing a robot, created using the AI image generator Midjourney by Guerrero Art, managed to deceive several AI image detectors. This underscores a fundamental issue with these tools - they ignore context clues and only look for unusual pixel arrangements, typically the markers of AI-created images.
  • The companies behind these detectors, including Sensity, Hive, and Inholo (the company behind Illuminarty), acknowledged their limitations. Hive noted that its misclassifications could occur due to the analysis of lower-quality images. Companies Umm-maybe and Optic, who own A.I. Art Detector and A.I. or Not respectively, did not comment.
  • The synthetic images tested came from various generative tools, such as Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and DALL-E. These tools are known for producing realistic portraits, nature images, and more.

This exploration underscores the need for further development in AI detection tools to match pace with advancements in AI image creation. As the proliferation of AI-generated images threatens to blur the line between reality and fiction, reliable detection tools are becoming increasingly paramount. The digital realm awaits with bated breath as the tug-of-war between AI creators and detectors continues.

References: [1].

Recent Posts See all
AI Takes the Lead in Customer Retention: 70% of Restaurants Now Use or Test AI for Loyalty Programs
AI Agriculture Revolution: How Digital Tools are Tackling MENA’s Food Security Crisis
Powering the Future: China’s Battery Race to Boost AI Employees and Humanoid Robots
Industries
  • Restaurants
  • Fitness & Wellness
  • Home Services
  • Cleaning Services
  • Dental & Orthodontics
Company
  • Digital Employee
  • About Us
Resources
  • Pricing
  • Documentation
  • Academy
  • Community
  • Partner Program
Contact Us
  • Linkedin
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • © 2025 Newo.ai
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Data Processing Addendum
  • Trust Center